SUN Countries are working towards demonstrating better use of finance data through improved advocacy, planning and impact which will lead to increased resources from both domestic and external sources. They do this by regularly and transparently tracking nutrition budget allocations against multi-sectoral nutrition plans.
Tracking nutrition investments
How much do governments invest in nutrition?
Each SUN Country has a different context, and therefore, there is no gold-standard for investigating national budgets that can be used by all. Nevertheless, SUN Countries are undertaking the SUN Movement Budget Analysis Exercise and the experience is proving to be a valuable cross-country learning experience. In a study undertaken by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) funded MQSUN project, based on the SUN Movement Budget Analysis Exercise, the variation of nutrition related investments can be seen in the graph to the right. Across the 24 countries, 33 per cent is spent on agriculture, education, social protection and health. The nutrition communities are crunching the numbers to make these budgets work harder for nutrition by incorporating nutrition targets and through tracking impact.
Budget Analysis for Nutrition
By 2018, 47 countries conducted an analysis of their government budgets, with 26 countries having done it for the second time. These efforts show that it is feasible to conduct a budget analysis but also that this process needs to be sustained and improved. This guidance note builds on previous versions (2015, 2016 and 2017) and benefited from inputs and review from many partners. The document is developed to support SUN Government Focal Points and their in-country partners, as they constitute the so-called national Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Nutrition. The content and format of the guidance note is meant to be continuously updated as new evidence and lessons become available.
• Download the 2018 Guidance note: English
The need to better track nutrition investments has been highlighted since the beginning of the Movement. A 2013 literature review examined what could be done to track spending and in 2014, online budget reviews were undertaken of 28 countries in the SUN Movement. The 3-Step Approach to Budget Analysis was identified by SUN Countries and technical partners as a quick and practical way to report on nutrition relevant allocations in national budgets. The objective of the 2014 pilot exercise in Costa Rica was to reach an estimate of the total budget allocated to nutrition relevant activities across key sectors based on a common understand with key Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs). These findings were presented at the 2014 SUN Movement Global Gathering.
By June 2015, in response to a call of interest during the 17th series of SUN Country Network Meetings, 30 SUN Countries had gone through Step One and Step Two and 14 of those had made considerable progress with Step 3. The preliminary analysis, was featured in the 2015 Global Nutrition Report and used to inform the first ever framework for investing in nutrition, in addition to being presented at the 2015 SUN Movement Global Gathering.
As of 2016, the budget analysis work has continued with 19 additional SUN Countries joining the exercise for the first time in addition to 22 countries undertaking the exercise for the second time.
Last updated: December 2016
David Nabarro, former SUN Movement Coordinator, commends the budget analysis work of SUN Countries during the 2015 SUN Movement Global Gathering.
Nutrition financing: Why does it matter? by SPRING – USAID’s technical program
The 3-Step Approach to Budget Analysis & regional workshops
The 3-Step Approach is recognised in the SUN Movement as a quick and practical way to report on nutrition relevant allocations in national budgets. The overall approach is largely based on the SUN Donor Network Methodology. The 3-Step Approach is a useful exercise in transparency as it allows countries to view changes in budgetary allocations (and actual expenditures when possible) in national budgets over time. While the results do not directly allow for comparisons across countries due to the variations between countries, the 3-Step approach is designed to help countries to identify gaps between what is needed, and what is spent.
Identifying relevant budget-line items through a strategically created key word search. Where possible, the initial search relates to relevant outcomes and actions as presented in national plans for nutrition.
Clearly assessing whether the identified budget-line items are specific to nutrition, which allocations are related to nutrition (nutrition-sensitive), and those which are unrelated to nutrition. The budget-line items that are found to be not relevant for nutrition are excluded from the analysis after further consultations.
Weighting or applying an attributed percentage of the allocated budget-line item to nutrition where the percentage is based on the step-two categorization as well as consultation with national experts.
The 3-Step Approach
Reports, presentations, tools & guidance
- 2016 Nairobi Regional Workshop Report English
- 2016 Bangkok Regional Workshop Report English
- 2016 MQSUN Report: Analysis of Nutrition-Sensitive Budget Allocations English
- 2015 Short Synthesis Report: SUN Movement Budget Analysis Exercise English | Français
Technical consultation series & presentations
Tools and guidance
- Budget Analysis Excel Worksheet Template (2017) English
- Guidance for Budget Analysis (2017) English
- SUN Guidance: 3-Step Approach (2016) English
- SUN Guidance: Step 2 and 3 (2015) English
- SUN Guidance: 3-Step Approach (2015) English
- SUN Budget Analysis Reporting Template (2015) English
- SPRING Guidance: Nutrition Budget Analysis Tool English
- SPRING Excel: English
Learnings and challenges
Learnings from the 3-Step Approach
Step one: Learnings from SUN Countries: Analyses focused on the national government budgets that were publicly available and did not include sub-national governments, with the exception of Pakistan. Most analayses also focused only on the allocations that are documented in national budgets (on-budget), leaving the off-budget allocations out of the analysis.
Step two: Learnings from SUN Countries: For “nutrition-specific” interventions, emphasis was placed on the importance of the continuum of care targeting the First 1,000 Days and women in reproductive age, including adolescent girls. When it was not obvious from the programme name or description, two criteria were identified as useful for taking decisions on the categorization:
- Defining the expected outcomes, including the contribution of sectors towards positive behavioral changes in feeding practices and consumption patterns (e.g. access to a balanced diet throughout the year); and,
- Identifying the targeted population (direct and indirect beneficiaries of a given action).
Step three: Learnings from SUN Countries: There was considerable discussion on what “weights” should be applied for nutrition-sensitive allocations based on:
- Their expected outcome (theoretical weight reflecting the literature) or;
- Based on an estimate of the nutrition component (predictable weight reflecting the amount of nutrition activities in an integrated programme)
Three challenges emerging from the exercise:
- Accounting for personnel costs
- Inconsistent categorisation of nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific budget line items
- Analysing allocations at sub-national level
SUN Country investment snapshots
English snapshots (Nutrition Investments snapshots)
French snapshots (Aperçu des investissements en nutrition)
Spanish snapshots (Panorama de las Inversiones en Nutrición)
By Ambarka Youssoufane – Originally published by ENN Online On the 15 November this year, the Niger government took a big step forward in tackling malnutrition by adopting its first ever nutrition policy known as the “national multisectoral nutrition security policy”. The policy aims to achieve...
Improving diets in an era of food market transformation: Challenges & opportunities for engagement between public & private sectors
The policy brief, by the Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition in partnership with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), suggests ways in which governments can persuade food industry partners to provide consumers with better access to healthier diets.